Mats Rosenkranz vs Tristan Mccormick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Which player has a slight edge in second serve performance? Tristan Mccormick, as he edges out Mats Rosenkranz, winning 46.60% of points compared to Rosenkranz's 46.16% in recent form.
• In recent return game stats, Mccormick has a slight lead, winning 44.57% of opponent's second serves compared to Rosenkranz's 43.58%.
• Mccormick has a stronger performance in first serve returns, capturing 25.53% of points compared to Rosenkranz's 22.77%.
• Under pressure, Mccormick again demonstrates an advantage, saving 60.16% of breakpoints versus Rosenkranz's 52.65%.
• In general match performance over the last year, Rosenkranz outperforms Mccormick, winning 61.73% of his matches against Mccormick's 53.75%.
• Both players show their top career surface wins on grass at 60%, but Mccormick shows superior performance on hard courts at 55% compared to Rosenkranz's 44%.
• Considering player levels, Rosenkranz competes mainly in higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments, whereas Mccormick plays mainly in Futures/Satellites events, leading to different win rates that are not directly comparable.
• Rosenkranz has slightly faced better opponents, with their opponents having an average ranking of 375.84 versus Mccormick's 401.89.
• In deciding set situations, Rosenkranz shows stronger resolve, winning 63% of such sets compared to Mccormick's 53%.

Editorial Prediction (October 6, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performances of both players, there are distinct strengths and advantages that each brings to the court. Mccormick has shown precision in second serve and return game stats, proving to be slightly superior in these nuanced areas. His ability to save a higher percentage of breakpoints further adds to his competitiveness in a tightly contested match.

However, Rosenkranz displays a more consistent overall win rate and experience in higher-level competitions. His ability to excel in deciding sets indicates a mental toughness and the capability to perform under pressure, a critical factor in predicting outcomes of close matches.

While both have identical grass court records, which neutralizes any advantages in playing surface, the intense experience level of Rosenkranz might prove crucial. Considering the combination of these factors, Mats Rosenkranz emerges as the likelier victor in this upcoming matchup.